The controversial things that YouTuber Dhruv Rathee said about Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the latter’s recent trip to Norway caused a huge uproar on social media. Actor and former politician Gul Panag has strongly responded to Rathee.
After a conversation with a Norwegian writer at a foreign media event, Rathee shared posts that were critical of Prime Minister Modi. This caused a stir. Rathee is said to have said in one of his posts that the Prime Minister “deserves to be humiliated everywhere he goes” and asked why there weren’t any press talks during Modi’s time in office. His words quickly became popular and split people on social media into two sharp groups.
Gul Panag says that criticism should not turn into disrespect
In a public response to Rathee’s comments, Gul Panag said that in a democracy, it is perfectly fine to disagree with a political leader or the government. She did say, though, that making fun of the Prime Minister’s job in another country “doesn’t feel right.”
Panag said that discussion and feedback are important parts of a political society, but she also said that established institutions should be respected. It hurts not only the leader but also the organization and the country’s image when people outside India treat the job of Prime Minister as a joke.
Her words went viral online right away. A lot of people liked how fair she was, saying that political disagreements shouldn’t lead to public shaming on global platforms. Others, though, supported Rathee and said that harsh criticism of politicians is also part of free speech and accountability in a democracy.
Read also: Modi Ji Said WFH”: Memes Flood Social Media Amid Work From Home Debate
The Event in Norway That Started the Row
The argument started when PM Modi recently went to Norway. During a meeting with the press, Norwegian reporter Helle Lyng tried to ask a question, which caused a lot of controversy. There were claims that PM Modi decided not to reply and ended the conversation, sparking a lot of online discussion.
Rathee had strong feelings about what happened and wrote a lot about them on social media. He said the Prime Minister was not taking responsibility and told foreign reporters to keep asking tough questions when they went to other countries. His words quickly spread to X and other sites, starting a heated political discussion.
The problem wasn’t just talked about in political circles. The issue got a lot of attention on social media, with celebrities, reporters, political allies, and critics all joining in. Some people thought Rathee’s words were important criticism of leadership, while others thought the tone was rude and unnecessary.
Some people on social media disagree about free speech and the national image
The fight between Gul Panag and Dhruv Rathee is now part of a much bigger online discussion about free speech, nationalism, criticising the government, and the worth of public institutions.
Rathee’s supporters said that leaders in a democracy should always be ready for tough questions and public criticism. They said that people should be held accountable for everything and that public figures should always be able to be questioned.
Panag fans, on the other hand, thought there was a difference between being criticised and being put down. Many people agreed with her that foreign events shouldn’t be used to make fun of the country’s most important elected official.
People on Reddit and other discussion sites also had things to say about the issue. They talked about PM Modi’s relationships with the media, political criticism, and the power of influential people to change public opinion. Some online users supported Rathee’s harsh stance, while others spoke out against what they termed “performative outrage” and too much political division.
Read also: Trapped Behind Closed Doors- The Twisha Sharma Case That Has Shocked the Nation
The political background of Gul Panag draws more attention to him
Interestingly, Gul Panag’s comments received even more attention because she is known for her political views and has even run for office before. Because of this, many people thought her statements were more complex than politics.
Many people on social media were surprised by Panag’s criticism of Rathee, as she has often spoken about democratic ideals and moral duty. Many people said that what she said wasn’t a defence of the government, but rather a call to be respectful when disagreeing.
Dhruv Rathee, on the other hand, is still one of India’s most popular political YouTubers. His videos commenting on politics, government, and current events regularly get millions of views. His strong ideas often lead to heated arguments online, and this latest issue seems to be no different.
The bigger question that hasn’t been answered yet is where the line should be drawn between political criticism and disrespect for public institutions. The debate is still popular online. At least for now, the fight between Gul Panag and Dhruv Rathee has shown how split Indian political talk has become online.
A versatile writer mainly works on trending news, daily updates from politics, business, crime, current affairs and entertainment.
